Most companies do not have a data problem. They have a transfer problem: the same figures rekeyed from the CRM into the ERP into a spreadsheet into an invoice, by someone whose job it should not be, with a typo rate nobody measures.
AGI Software Solutions builds the integrations that connect the systems you already run — ERP, CRM, accounting, warehouse, e-commerce, payments and internal tools — so records move between them automatically, with reconciliation and failure handling designed in. A single well-scoped integration typically runs $15k–$30k; a multi-system integration programme with data migration runs $40k–$80k, and the usual payback is the manual hours it removes within the first year.
Any competent developer can move a record from A to B on the happy path. Integration becomes engineering at the second attempt: partial failures, duplicates, out-of-order updates, and the question of which system wins when two disagree.
Data entered once and propagated everywhere it is needed, which eliminates a class of error that no amount of staff diligence ever fully solves.
Retries, idempotency and dead-letter queues so a system being briefly unavailable is a logged event rather than a silently lost order.
Every transfer logged and reconcilable, so "did that order reach the warehouse" is a query rather than a phone call.
Clean APIs over the systems that hold your operational data — the prerequisite for any AI project that needs more than a document upload.
Software integration is the work of making separate systems behave as one: moving records between them, keeping them consistent, and resolving what happens when they disagree. In practice it covers API integration, webhooks, scheduled synchronisation, message queues, data migration and the middleware that sits between systems never designed to meet.
The difficult part is not the connection. It is deciding which system holds the truth for each field, what happens when one is unreachable, and how a failed transfer gets retried without creating a duplicate. Integrations that skip those questions work in testing and quietly corrupt data in production.
We build on both. This is the split we use to choose — and we will point you at the cheaper option when it fits.
| Zapier / Make / iPaaS | Custom integration | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Simple app-to-app triggers | Business-critical, high-volume data flows |
| Volume | Priced per task — costly at scale | Fixed infrastructure cost regardless of volume |
| Error handling | Retry and an alert email | Reconciliation, dead-letter queues, audit trail |
| Complex mapping | Awkward past a few conditions | Whatever the business rules require |
| Legacy systems | Only if a connector exists | Databases, files, SOAP, screen-scraping if needed |
| Ongoing cost | Per-task, rising with the business | Hosting plus maintenance |
The same process on every engineering project, scaled to the size of the problem.
We map what the process actually does today, including the parts that live in one person’s head, and what it costs when it goes wrong.
Data model, integration points, permissions and hosting decided up front, because these are the choices that are expensive to reverse later.
Working software every couple of weeks, sequenced so the riskiest piece reaches real users first rather than last.
Connecting to the systems that hold your data, then security, load and failure testing against realistic volumes instead of demo data.
Documentation, a walkthrough for whoever maintains it, and ongoing support if you want it. The repository is yours either way.
The patterns we see deliver, across startups, SMEs and enterprise teams.
Orders flowing from the storefront or CRM into accounting and back, with tax, discount and credit rules applied consistently.
Stock levels, shipments and returns kept consistent across e-commerce, warehouse and ERP without a nightly manual export.
Support, sales and billing records joined so the person on the phone can see the whole account rather than one system’s slice of it.
Exposing your systems to AI assistants and agents through MCP, with scoped permissions, so models can act on real data safely.
Deliberately boring, widely supported technology. The goal is software your team can still hire for in five years.
React, Next.js and TypeScript, with server rendering where it earns its keep for speed or SEO.
FastAPI, Django and Node.js. Python where the work touches data or models, TypeScript where it does not.
PostgreSQL as the default, Redis for caching and queues, and a vector store only when retrieval genuinely needs one.
Docker and Kubernetes on AWS, GCP, Azure or your own servers. Your cloud account, your bill, your control.
REST and GraphQL APIs, webhooks, message queues and MCP servers for the systems that need to talk to AI.
Automated tests, CI on every commit, staged deploys and monitoring wired in before launch rather than after the first outage.
Demand forecasting, OCR-driven receiving and anomaly detection across 14 fulfilment centres.
One inbox across web chat, email, WhatsApp and Facebook, with AI replies trained on past resolutions.
Support chatbot, live SEO analyser and a vector recommendation engine, all sharing one retrieval layer.
“We needed a voice agent that could actually qualify leads, not a chatbot pretending to be one. The team shipped a sub-700ms pipeline in 6 weeks. It now handles 5k calls a day.”
“What sold us was their willingness to put AI engineers and product designers on the same call. We got working prototypes by week two and a production rollout in three months.”
“AGI designed a CRM system tailored to our client management process. It is intuitive, reliable, and has centralized all our communication and history in one dashboard. This has greatly improved client retention.”
A single well-scoped integration between two systems typically runs $15k–$30k. A programme connecting several systems with data migration and reconciliation runs $40k–$80k. Where an API is missing or badly documented, discovery is the variable — we scope that separately rather than guessing at it.
There is nearly always a route: a direct database connection, file exports, an undocumented internal endpoint, or a wrapper service in front of the application. We have integrated systems whose vendors insisted it was impossible. It costs more, and we say so up front.
If the flow is simple, low-volume and can tolerate an occasional miss, yes — and we will tell you so rather than sell you a build. Custom integration earns its cost when volume makes per-task pricing painful, when the mapping logic is genuinely complex, or when a lost record is a real business problem.
By deciding in advance. For each field we agree which system is authoritative, and conflicts are either resolved by that rule or raised into a review queue. Integrations without that rule do not fail loudly — they quietly diverge until someone notices at year end.
A straightforward two-system integration takes 3–6 weeks including testing against real data. Multi-system programmes run 2–4 months. Most of the schedule is edge cases and reconciliation, not the connection itself.
It is usually the prerequisite. AI projects stall because the data sits in systems the model cannot reach. Clean integrations and MCP servers over your systems are what make assistants and agents possible later, and the integration is worth doing on its own merits regardless.
Tell us what the system would need to do and what it is replacing. We will tell you whether it is worth building and roughly what it takes.